Updated March 25, 2008

 
Preventing Folklore, Rumors (or Rumours) and Urban Myths
From Interfering with Development and Aid/Relief Efforts

 
On the previous page, I list situations where rumors and myth-spreading has interfered with development, aid or relief efforts.

Rumors can come from misinterpretations of what a community is seeing, hearing or experiencing, or willful misrepresentation by people who, for whatever reason, want to derail a development or relief activity. Anyone working in development or relief efforts needs to be aware of the power of rumor, and prepared to counter such, whatever the source.

A good place to start is with the acknowledgement that interpersonal sources of information play a HUGE role in communications delivery all over the world, whether in a low-literacy village in a developing country or a large urban area in an emerging economy. Interpersonal communications can both promote AND counter rumors and myth and, therefore, must be kept in mind when launching any communications strategy -- or counter strategy -- regarding a development or aid activity.

Also, a conclusion that can be reached in looking at the various ways myth and misinformation has interfered with development efforts is that the more a development activity is seen as outsiders-coming-in, the more likely it can be derailed by rumors. By contrast, the more development activities are perceived as owned by the people to be served, the more rumor-proof such activities will be. If messages come from those a community trusts, and via the ways a community communicates naturally, the messages are more likely to be embraced.

The importance of social mobilization as a part of development activities is tremendous in preventing or countering myth as an obstacle to development:

Social Mobilization, as defined by UNICEF, is a broad scale movement to engage people's participation in achieving a specific development goal through self-reliant efforts. It involves all relevant segments of society: decision and policy makers, opinion leaders, bureaucrats and technocrats, professional groups, religious associations, commerce and industry, communities and individuals. It is a planned decentralized process that seeks to facilitate change for development through a range of players engaged in interrelated and complementary efforts. It takes into account the felt needs of the people, embraces the critical principle of community involvement, and seeks to empower individuals and groups for action... Mobilizing the necessary resources, disseminating information tailored to targeted audiences, generating intersectoral support and fostering cross-professional alliances are also part of the process. Social mobilization in total aims at a continuum of activities in a broad strategic framework. The process encompasses dialogue and partnership with a wide spectrum of societal elements.

The ICEC and Global Social Mobilization, October 2000
The International Communication Enhancement Center
Tulane University

With those thoughts in mind, below is a list of activities I've seen reported as being effective in preventing and countering rumors and myth from interfering with development or relief activities, as well as activities I've undertaken myself. However, please note that this is not a comprehensive list, nor are all of these communications activities appropriate for every development or aid effort: In my opinion, the three lessons that these activities reinforce altogether is:
  1. the vital importance of being in-tune with local people,
  2. that those behind a development or aid effort must work to be perceived as coming from a place of honesty, sincerity and respect for local people, and
  3. that the message must be owned and delivered primarily by local people themselves.
Also, the above suggestions are no substitution for reading in-depth about rumor and myth interfering with development efforts. Recommendations for further reading will be provided in the coming weeks.

Sources:

 
I'm not interested in just urban legends but, specifically misinformation that interferes with relief or development efforts (including post-conflict situations). And most especially, I'm interested in ways that such misinformation has been countered successfully. If you have related information or examples, please contact me.

What I'm also wondering: are their any efforts in Arab-speaking countries, Africa, and elsewhere similar to the myth-busting Straight Dope column by Cecil Adams in the USA? Or truthorfiction.com? If you know of such, please contact me.

If you are interested in updates to this section of my web site, subscribe to my blog, which I use to promote updates to this and other non-technical parts of my site.

 
Back to my development blog main page

 

border

   these are NOT official Open University Web pages   

about J. Cravens | return to home page | contact me