Revised with new information: Januayr 04, 2010

 
Nonprofit Organizations and Online Social Networking:
Advice and Commentary

 
Your reaction to reading the words "online social networking" (OSN) for the first time is probably, "isn't that just another description of the Internet?" Yes, actually -- the Internet has always been touted as a place to exchange ideas and to create networks and communities that can defy traditional community structures and hierarchies. This techie buzz phrase "online social networking" or "Web 2.0" is meant to describe new web-based online communities meant to encourage members to socialize with each other online. These platforms are sometimes referred to as FOAF (Friend-of-a-Friend), because when you join, you note who else on the network is your "friend" or associate, and others are able to see these associations -- that's the main focus of the platforms. These platforms are also set up for members to talk frequently online and to provide updates to each other automatically. Many users find OSN sites easy-to-use as "one stop" shops, since so many tools are all in one place: to chat live with other members, to share photos, to share music and photos, to know which friends have updated information, etc. OSN platforms also feel exclusive and special, something young people find particularly appealing.

Some of the most popular OSN sites worldwide are MySpace (yes, people are still using MySpace), FaceBook, Bebo, Xanga and Friendster. There are also professional online networks that use online social networking tools, such as LinkedIn and Plaxo, and issues-focused online networks, such as Change.org. Wikipedia hosts a relatively comprehensive list of online networking platforms; however, note that they don't distinguish between social networking sites and professional networking sites, as I do.

For someone who remembers the criticisms of America Online, which had exactly the same appeal for many people in its early days, these social networking platforms can seem exclusionary and limited. By contrast, you don't have to be a "member" to view someone's information, or to search for such, on the World Wide Web -- the web is open to everyone. These relatively new networking sites can also generate a lot more work for users: you have to re-type information probably already available on your web site over and over again each time you join a network, to reach a smaller audience than is available on the entire World Wide Web.

But before we explore the downsides of OSN, let's first look at the advantages of using online social and professional networking platforms:

Outreach is done generally the same way on each platform:  
However, THERE ARE DOWNSIDES that nonprofits need to be aware of when using online networking sites, particularly social networking sites: Your organization should have a written policy regarding how paid staff and volunteers should and should not engage as representatives of your organization online, including on OSN platforms. Make it clear to volunteers, for instance, that while it's fine for them to highlight their role as volunteers for your organization in their online conversations, that does not necessarily make them official representatives of such, and any comments or questions about your organization they see online, including on OSN platforms, should be brought to the attention of appropriate member of the organization's core staff.

 
Where to get started?

If you are totally in the dark about how online networking platforms work and you are too daunted to experiment with them on your own, ask your volunteers or even your clients if any among them would feel comfortable coming onsite and showing you how social networking platforms work, and how various nonprofit organizations are using them. You probably already have volunteers or members who would love to share this information with you.

Wikipedia hosts a relatively comprehensive list of online networking platforms; however, note that they don't distinguish between social networking sites and professional networking sites.

 
Why am I not any more of an advocate for OSN?

Because the returns on the significant time investment required for using are not at all substantial for most nonprofit organizations -- huge numbers of new volunteers and donors are not being reached as a result of using OSN by the majority of nonprofit organizations and NGOs. Hundreds or thousands of "friends" is not translating into significant numbers of new volunteers or financial donations. Most nonprofits are struggling to keep just their simple web sites up-to-date and answering the many, many inquiries they already receive via email. These organizations don't have the time nor the staff to figure out on their own how to use every OSN platforms, nor which ones to use (there seems to be new ones announced every week), and also don't have the staff or resources to keep their information up-to-date on these various locations as well their web sites. In addition, "traditional" online communities, whether on YahooGroups or GoogleGroups or another web-based platform, or even via email, are already connecting nonprofit professionals with many more people and organizations than a nonprofit can keep up with. If a nonprofit has a web site, has an email newsletter, staff members who occasionally use online discussion groups, and volunteer recruitment posts to something like VolunteerMatch, I consider that nonprofit very tech savvy -- to be using OSN as well takes an enormous amount of time and resources that the vast majority of nonprofits just don't have (and that's without even considering podcasts, blogging and videos as well.

Most funders are never going to fund staff at a nonprofit to engage in all of these online activities (most funders still balk at paying for things like copy machines or chairs). Therefore, the only way most nonprofits are going to be able to use OSN platforms outside of asking volunteers to include information in their profiles is to find very dedicated, very knowledgeable and very trustworthy volunteers, including online volunteers working from home, school or their own work place, to engage in these activities on the organization's behalf. But, as with any activity, the nonprofit needs to think strategically about engaging in OSN: what's the goal of participation? what will success as a result of participation look like? how will the success of this activity be measured?

As regular readers of my web site know, I am a member of many online communities, each focused on a different aspect of my work, and have been a huge fan of, and advocate for, networking with others online since the mid 1990s. Clearly, I'm not telling nonprofits to not engage in OSN. I am, rather, trying to help nonprofits to have a realistic expectation about such platforms, and to think strategically and deliberately about how they will use such, before making the significant time investment to engage in these online activities.

TechSoup has a good article about nonprofits and OSN that includes some concrete examples of nonprofits using OSN platforms to connect with supporters. It actually reads like articles about the early days of initial nonprofit use of the web, when the novelty of making information and needs available resulted in immediate floods of new supporters and resources. However, those times wore off quickly. Also, what's still needed are examples that include details on how such organizations can manage all these massive amounts of information, who actually inputs all of the information again and again in all these closed communities and regularly checks the email inboxes of such, how nonprofits choose which community for what activity, how OSN has not worked in certain instances, etc.

Do I use any networking platforms? I've got a professional profile at LinkedIn, and have joined a few groups on the site and frequently answer nonprofit-related questions on its questions forum. I've got a profile at Change.org, but haven't become a regular user. I have a fan page on Facebook and an account on Twitter, both of which I use to post links to my most-recent blog posts and to micro-blog. I've started, and abandoned, participation on at least three other online networks. For me, simple theme-based online communities via YahooGroups or an email platform remain the easiest to use, the easiest to integrate already-published information on the web, and the best way to reach both colleagues, new resources and potential clients. I'm already on overload when it comes to email and online profiles -- unless more hours get added to the day and I also become agoraphobic, I'm at my online membership limit.

 
Also see:

 
Return to the index of resources for "Community Relations, With and Without Technology"

  Read and subscribe to Jayne's Blog

If you liked the content of this web page, subscribe to my blog so you can know when this page, and other pages on my site, are updated. Don't have an RSS reader to subscribe to blogs? Not sure what RSS is? Try this RSS tutorial.


Disclaimer: No guarantee of accuracy or suitability is made by the poster/distributor. This material is provided as is, with no expressed or implied warranty.

Permission is granted to copy, present and/or distribute a limited amount of material from this web site without charge to recipients if the information is kept intact and without alteration, and is credited to:

Jayne Cravens & Coyote Communications, www.coyotecommunications.com

Otherwise, please contact me for permission to reprint, present or distribute these materials (for instance, in a class or book you intend to charge for).

consulting services | about Jayne Cravens | return to home page |
contact me | linking to or from these pages

The art work and material on this site was created and is copyrighted 1996-2010
by Jayne Cravens, all rights reserved
(unless noted otherwise, or the art is a link to another web site).